MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120054786 · doi:10.1109/ivnc.2005.1619546

Field emission properties of lanthanum sulfide thin films deposited on Si and InP substrates by pulsed laser deposition

2006· article· en· W2120054786 on OpenAlexaff
M. Cahay, V. Semet, Vu Thien Binh, Steven B. Fairchild, Xiaozhi Wu, D. J. Lockwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAmorphous solidPulsed laser depositionThin filmField electron emissionSubstrate (aquarium)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Transmission electron microscopyScanning electron microscopeDeposition (geology)Surface roughnessOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyElectronCrystallographyComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films of lanthanum monosulfide (LaS) have been successfully deposited on Si and InP substrates by pulsed laser deposition. The values of deposition parameters (chamber pressure, substrate temperature, substrate-to-target separation, laser energy, repetition rate and spot size on the target) leading to a successful growth of cubic rocksalt structure films are identified. For the films grown on Si substrates, the root-mean-square (RMS) variation of surface roughness is found to be 1.74 nm by atomic force microscopy. XRD scans suggest the presence of amorphous regions in the film. This is confirmed by cross-section transmission electron microscopy analysis. For films grown on InP substrates, a thin crystalline film about 500 nm thick followed by an abrupt transition to an amorphous layer about 120 nm thick is observed. The work function of the LaS thin films deposited on Si substrates deduced from Fowler-Nordheim plots at room temperature has a mean value of 0.65 eV, when measured using the scanning field emission microscope technique (SAFEM) at very different locations across the sample. A strong dependence of the field emission current with temperature is also observed. At very large external electric field, the field emission increases dramatically and is no longer of the Fowler-Nordheim type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207