An interactive system for the automatic generation of huge handwriting databases from a few specimens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Sigma-Lognormal model of the kinematic theory of rapid human movements, has been implemented in an interactive software tool, allowing the generation of databases of unlimited size from a few online handwriting specimens of letters and words. Online trajectories of a target word produced by a few writers are fitted by the Sigma-Lognormal parameters; using the interactive system. Thereafter, the fiducial pattern of the word is constructed and the writer variability is circumscribed respectively from the mean values and the standard deviations of the extracted parameters. Typical simulation results obtained by randomly fixing the parameters inside these realistic intervals are presented to highlight the ability of the generator to produce a large variety of multi-writer and writer-dependent handwriting patterns as observed in real data. Overall, this software tool provides new insights on the development of huge databases for the training and testing of online handwriting classifiers and recognizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it