MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120173546 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl506

Predicted function of the vaccinia virus G5R protein

2006· article· en· W2120173546 on OpenAlexafffund
Melissa Da Silva, Ling Shen, Vasily Tcherepanov, Cristalle N. Watson, Chris Upton

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of California, San FranciscoU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsVacciniaVirologyVirusFunction (biology)BiologyOrthopoxvirusComputational biologyComputer scienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Of the approximately 200 proteins that have been identified for the vaccinia virus (VACV) genome, many are currently listed as having an unknown function, and seven of these are also found in all other poxvirus genomes that have been sequenced. The G5R protein of VACV is included in this list, and to date, very little is known about this essential and highly conserved protein. Conventional similarity searches of protein databases do not identify significantly similar proteins, and experimental approaches have been unsuccessful at determining protein function. RESULTS: Using HHsearch, a hidden Markov model (HMM) comparison search tool, the G5R protein was found to be similar to both human and archaeal flap endonucleases (FEN-1) with 96% probability. The G5R protein structure was subsequently successfully modeled using the Robetta protein structure prediction server with an archaeal FEN-1 as the template. The G5R model was then compared to the human FEN-1 crystal structure and was found to be structurally similar to human FEN-1 in both active site residues and DNA substrate binding regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207