Fragmentation study of salinomycin and monensin A antibiotics using electrospray quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragmentation pathways of two selected ionophore antibiotics, salinomycin and monensin A, were studied using electrospray (ES) orthogonal acceleration quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in positive-ion mode. The identity of fragment ions was determined by accurate-mass measurements. In ES mass spectra, ion signals of relatively high intensity were observed for [M+Na](+) and [M-H+2Na](+) for each antibiotic. Each of the ion species [M+Na](+) and [M-H+2Na](+) for salinomycin and [M-H+2Na](+) for monensin A were isolated in turn and subjected to fragmentation. In the fragmentation of [M+Na](+) and [M-H+2Na](+) from salinomycin, only Cbond;C single bond cleavage and dehydration were observed. Product ion mass spectra obtained from [M-H+2Na](+) of monensin A showed that ether ring opening, Cbond;C single bond cleavage and dehydration fragmentations had occurred. Fragment ions containing two sodium atoms were observed in the product ion mass spectrum of [M-H+2Na](+) from salinomycin, but not from monensin A. Both type A (containing the terminal carboxyl group) and type F (containing the terminal hydroxyl group) fragment ions were observed in the product ion mass spectra of sodium adduct ions of salinomycin and monensin A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".