Local Anesthetics Induce Chondrocyte Death in Bovine Articular Cartilage Disks in a Dose‐ and Duration‐Dependent Manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various local anesthetics on chondrocyte viability in articular cartilage by use of a bovine disk model. METHODS: Full-thickness bovine cartilage disks were isolated from the condylar surfaces of the radial-carpal joint by use of a 4-mm biopsy punch and were incubated in various concentrations of local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine) for varying amounts of time and stained for membrane integrity by use of ethidium bromide and SYTO 13 stain (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA). Cell and nuclear morphology was assessed by transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: The addition of local anesthetics (i.e., 0.25% bupivacaine, 1% lidocaine, and 0.5% ropivacaine) to bovine articular cartilage disks had a negative effect on chondrocyte viability. Culturing bovine articular cartilage disks for increasing periods of time decreased chondrocyte viability for each of the local anesthetics, with significant negative correlations being shown between time of exposure to the drug and chondrocyte viability. These effects were also affected by the presence or absence of epinephrine in local anesthetic preparations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that local anesthetics (i.e., bupivacaine, lidocaine, or ropivacaine) can have a detrimental effect on chondrocyte viability in bovine articular cartilage disks in a dose- and duration-dependent manner. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After arthroscopic surgery, it has been common practice to inject various local anesthetics into the joint for pain relief. Because adult chondrocytes have little or no capacity to regenerate, these results suggest that high-dose, long-term intra-articular administration of local anesthetics should be performed with caution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".