MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120288247 · doi:10.1093/hmg/10.24.2803

Developmental expression of the fragile X-related 1 proteins in mouse testis: association with microtubule elements

2001· article· en· W2120288247 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc‐Étienne Huot

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsHôpital Saint-François d'Assise
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyGene isoformMicrotubuleFragile X syndromeMessenger RNACytoskeletonCell biologyCytoplasmRNA-binding proteinMicrotubule-associated proteinMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fragile X mental retardation 1 protein (FMRP) is the archetype of a class of cytoplasmic mRNA-binding proteins that includes the fragile X-related 1 and 2 proteins (FXR1P and FXR2P). Whereas absence of FMRP is the cause of fragile X syndrome, it is not known if FXR1P and FXR2P are associated with any pathology. It is also still elusive whether these homologous proteins can partially compensate for the absence of FMRP in the case of the fragile X syndrome. FXR1 is widely expressed in mammals and its expression pattern is complex since several mRNA variants and protein isoforms are detected. In mouse, we observed that the highest level of FXR1 is found in the adult testis. This tissue is an exception, since all known FXR1P isoforms, some of which have been considered as tissue specific, are detected in it. In young animals, changes in mRNA-spliced variants and their corresponding protein isoforms occur during spermatogenesis. Using biochemical, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic techniques, we show that FXR1P is associated with microtubule elements. Since the cytoskeletal framework is implicated in cellular plasticity as well as in mRNA transport, we propose new possibilities for the function(s) of the FXR proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207