Experimental Study On Compression Indices Of Gas Hydrate-bearing Sediments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract For gas hydrate production, gas hydrate-bearing sediments should be depressurized below the gas hydrate equilibrium pressure. Gas hydrate-bearing sediments are compacted during the depressurization process because additional effective stress evolves due to a decrease in pore pressure. The compaction of a gas hydrate reservoir can lead to several geotechnical problems such as the destabilization of the production well, settlement of the seafloor installation, or slope failure of the production site. Thus, it is important to determine the compression characteristics of gas hydrate-bearing sediments and the geotechnical behavior of gas hydrate-bearing sediments during the gas hydrate dissociation induced by the depressurization. In this study, gas hydrates were synthesized in remolded sediment samples that were originally cored from a hydrate occurrence region in the Ulleung Basin, the East Sea, offshore Korea. The volumetric strain (or change of void ratio) of gas hydrate-bearing sediment samples were measured for different gas hydrate saturations and under different vertical effective stresses. The experimental results reveal the relation between compression (or the slope of a normal consolidation line) of gas hydrate-bearing sediments and gas hydrate saturation. Experimental data for compression indices of gas hydrate-bearing sediments can be applied to numerical modeling for a geotechnical stability analysis of gas hydrate-bearing sediments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".