Planar ultrawideband antenna array for short‐range wireless communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, novel 2‐element and 4‐element planar ultrawideband (UWB) antenna arrays with bidirectional radiation patterns based on identical UWB antenna elements for UWB communications applications have been proposed, simulated and experimentally investigated. Each array is constructed by means of feeding omni‐directional printed UWB monopole antennas with a UWB power divider. The proposed 2‐element antenna array yields an impedance bandwidth of 110% (3.1–10.6 GHz) covering the whole UWB frequency bandwidth while the impedance bandwidth is multi‐band in case of the 4‐element antenna array because of the increasing effect of mutual coupling among antenna elements. The calculated gain of the 2‐element and 4‐element array is quite stable with about 3 and 6 dB higher than that of the single element, respectively. Both measured and calculated E‐plane radiation patterns of the array and the single element are almost the same while the H‐plane radiation patterns of the array are distinctively bidirectional compared to the omni‐directional pattern of the single element. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 52: 1061–1066, 2010; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.25140
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".