Design, synthesis, and properties of benzobisthiadiazole-based donor–π–acceptor–π–donor type of low-band-gap chromophores and polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel low-band-gap chromophore (5, 0.86 eV) having fluorene as a donor, benzobisthiadiazole (BBTD) as an acceptor, and pyrrole as a π-spacer was successfully designed and synthesized, to probe the effect of π-spacer on the band-gap level of the donor–π–acceptor–π–donor type of chromophores. Compared with the thiophene spacer analogue (in compound 3), the intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the pyrrole and the neighboring BBTD unit pushes the absorption maximum and fluorescence emission of chromophore 5 into the near-infrared spectral region with a red shift of 172 and 158 nm, respectively. The same red-shift phenomenon can also be realized by addition of Lewis acid (e.g., BF 3 ) to the BBTD-containing chromophores with other spacers. Attempt of using low-band-gap chromophore 5 in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells was made, showing a non-optimized photovoltaic device with the power conversion efficiency of 0.01%. A precursor approach to introduction of the alkaline-labile BBTD acceptor into the polymer backbone has been demonstrated by successful synthesis of low-band-gap polymer P2. The same strategy can be in principle applied to the synthesis of a series of low-band-gap chromophores or polymers with strong acceptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".