Totally Implantable Venous Access Device in Children with Cancer Lead to Disfiguring scar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In pediatric cancer patients scars of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) are often widened and hypertrophic. This study report on the prevalence and deviation of abnormal scarring in children with a TIVAD and to describe the influencing factors for this abnormal scarring. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study scars of 122 childhood cancer patients (age 1-21 years) were evaluated; 72 patients had a TIVAD in-situ and in 50 the TIVAD had been removed. Outcome parameters were hypertrophy (modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), scar surface area, pain, and itching. Scar abnormality was defined as mVSS of >2, or scar width >3 mm. RESULTS: Abnormal TIVAD scars were found in 107 participants. The mVSS score was higher in patients ≤45 months after removal and the widest >45 months after TIVAD removal. Multivariable analyses showed that the mVSS score was positively related with scar width (mm) and children being ≤45 months after TIVAD removal. Furthermore, TIVAD scar width was positively related with age at last TIVAD surgery, and associated with suture material. In conclusion, there was a high incidence of abnormal TIVAD scars with some pain and itching complaints. However, no typical cancer related influencing factors were associated with increasing abnormalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".