MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120585672 · doi:10.5539/jedp.v2n2p97

Factors that Motivates the Teacher Trainees of Teacher Training Institutions to Possess an Excellent Personality through Hermeneutic Analysis Method

2012· article· en· W2120585672 on OpenAlex
Suppiah Nachiappan, Hari Krishnan Andi, Sunder Subbramaniam, Velayudhan P. K. Veeran

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Professional Development and Motivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentPsychologyPersonalityFace (sociological concept)Mathematics educationPlan (archaeology)PedagogySocial psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivation plays an important role in determining one’s achievement level. Therefore, future teachers who areresponsible in leading their pupils’ need to be motivated so that they will be well prepared to face all theupcoming challenges in the education field. This research discusses on to what extent do the trainee teachers ofTamil option are familiar with the factors that motivate them to posses an excellent personality as a traineeteacher of Teacher Training Institute. The respondent’s research has been analysed using the hermeneuticanalysis. The finding of the research has shown that the trainee teachers of Tamil option are wise about thefactors that motivate them to get hold of an excellent personality as a trainee teacher. About 14 motivationalfactors that motivate this trainee teacher’s have been identified. These include the lecturers’, learning facilities,encouragement from the family members, primary school teachers, classmates, ambitions, dreams or desires,teaching methods, teachers’ role, teaching experience, the love for the mother tongue, self-confidence and lifegoals’, surroundings, systematic concern and friendly administrations, co-curricular activities and outdooreducation. This research has also identified the factors that trainee teachers know that it motivates them and thefactors are useful. Thus, knowledge of knowing the motivating factors that the trainee teachers get hold of can be utilized by parties who are directly involved with the trainee teacher to plan and conduct more effective teachingand learning activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.315
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it