MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120622581 · doi:10.3109/19396368.2010.512377

Factors Regulating Sperm Capacitation

2010· review· en· W2120622581 on OpenAlexaff
Janice L. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitationTyrosine phosphorylationPhosphorylationCell biologyBiologyProtein tyrosine phosphataseAcrosome reactionProtein phosphorylationProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcTyrosine kinaseSpermReceptor tyrosine kinaseTyrosineProtein kinase ASignal transductionBiochemistryMotilityGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capacitation is broadly defined as the functional modifications rendering sperm competent to fertilize, encompassing the ability of the sperm to bind the zona pellucida and subsequently undergo the acrosome reaction, hyperactivated motility, and the capacity to fuse with the oocyte. Although discovered in 1951, research over the past 15 years has considerably clarified the mechanisms leading to capacitation. The purpose of this review is to discuss the challenges of studying capacitation and to summarize recent notions regarding its regulation. Of particular interest is an atypical soluble adenylyl cyclase that is stimulated by bicarbonate to activate protein kinase A and drive sperm protein tyrosine phosphorylation. The identities of the phosphorylated sperm-protein substrates and the kinase(s) responsible for their tyrosine phosphorylation have fostered major questions regarding this pathway. Recent investigations, however, have made exciting advances toward resolving these queries. Advanced proteomic approaches have revealed the tyrosine phosphorylated substrates to be implicated in a diverse range of cellular activities. SRC tyrosine kinase is a particularly interesting candidate as the mediator of the protein kinase A-driven sperm protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Future studies are merited to fully characterize additional signaling mediators such as phosphatases and other kinases that may be involved, to elucidate the functional importance of the tyrosine phosphorylation on those particular substrates and to appreciate the differences that may exist among species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations170
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystems Biology in Reproductive MedicineSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207