MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120626205 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2008.927795

An Innovative Receiver for Incoherent SAC-OCDMA Enabling SOA-Based Noise Cleaning: Experimental Validation

2009· article· en· W2120626205 on OpenAlex
Julien Penon, Walid Mathlouthi, Sophie LaRochelle, Leslie A. Rusch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsNoise (video)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Noise reductionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Optical amplifierOptical filterTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsLaserArtificial intelligenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new low complexity receiver for spectral amplitude optical coded division multiple access (SAC OCDMA) that enables intensity noise reduction using semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs). Compared to the standard receiver requiring two optical filters at the receiver side, our receiver requires only one optical filter. While a 1.4-dB power penalty in incurred, network capacity is unchanged, i.e., BER floors due to intensity noise have the same level. The primary motivation for the low complexity receiver is not reduced component count, but rather modifying the receiver so that promising SOA noise mitigation techniques might be employed to increase system capacity. SOA noise cleaning suffers from a major limitation: filtering after the SOA can negate most of the signal enhancement, the so-called post SOA filtering issue. The only solution to date for the post-SOA filtering effect in SAC-OCDMA is prohibitively complex McCoy , <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">J.</i> <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Lightw.</i> <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Technol.</i> , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 394-401, Jan. 2007, i.e., requiring multiple SOAs per client. We demonstrate that our proposed receiver drastically limits the client side filtering, thus maintaining noise suppression and overcoming the post-SOA filtering effect. We compare BER at up to 10 Gb/s with and without noise cleaning. When a noise cleaning module is used, BER improvement of several orders-of-magnitude is observed when only a few users are active in the network. Examination of the noise properties, however, leads us to conclude that highly populated networks will have diminished improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it