MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120653500 · doi:10.1116/1.4935106

Fabrication of metal strip waveguides for optical and microwave data transmission

2015· article· en· W2120653500 on OpenAlexafffund
Behnam Banan, R. Niall Tait, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur, Pierre Berini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton UniversityMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill UniversityFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCMC MicrosystemsUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsMicrowaveFabricationWaveguideOpticsCoplanar waveguideSurface plasmon polaritonCladding (metalworking)Surface plasmonPlasmon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal strip waveguides and devices suitable for high-speed digital signal transmission at both microwave and optical frequencies are fabricated and demonstrated in this work. The waveguide structure consists of three metal strips forming a coplanar waveguide (CPW) to support a microwave mode. In the proposed structure, the signal line consists of a copper strip sandwiched between two thin gold layers. The CPW ground planes are thin gold strips supporting long-range surface plasmon polaritons (LRSPPs) at optical frequencies. Thus, the proposed structure can simultaneously support LRSPPs at optical frequencies and microwave signals up to at least 40 GHz. The metalizations are patterned using bilayer photolithography followed by thermal evaporation. Then, to create the signal waveguide, an O2 plasma etch of the cladding and copper E-beam evaporation are used. The fabrication process steps are verified through experimental characterization. Microwave and optical transmission through the fabricated devices is demonstrated using radio frequency probes applied to the top of the device and optical fibers in an end-fire coupling configuration, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207