Test of diurnal and semidiurnal tidal analysis of temperatures from SABER-like sampling of a realistic global model, CMAM-DAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Because the TIMED satellite orbit precesses slowly in local time, 3 degrees (12 min) per day, thus apparently covering all local times at low and mid latitudes in 2 months when ascending and descending nodes are included, there is a potential for determining migrating and non-migrating tides from temperatures. Many papers have been written on the subject, but none have taken a realistic model atmosphere with high time resolution and tested tidal analysis. The present paper contains results from a tidal analysis of a SABER-sampled global model, the Canadian Middle Atmosphere (data assimilated) Model, CMAM-DAS, which has hourly values, and compares these with analysis using the full model. Fits to 60 d intervals at the equator show reasonable agreement between full and SABER-sampled data analysis for mean, diurnal and semidiurnal tides, with or without inclusion of a linear detrend term. At 50° N where there is irregular coverage of local times, there are serious disagreements in all parameters except the background mean, and detrending has a significant effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".