Cardioprotective Effects of Ramipril and Losartan in Right Ventricular Pressure Overload in the Rabbit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of kinins in the cardioprotective effects of ACE inhibitors remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right ventricular pressure overload in rabbits was produced by pulmonary artery banding for 21 days. Rabbits were untreated, or they received the ACE inhibitor ramipril with or without bradykinin B(1) and B(2) receptor blockers or the angiotensin (Ang) II type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker losartan. Pulmonary artery banding caused right ventricular hypertrophy, depressed papillary muscle contractility, and loss of Ang II contractile effects because of a signaling defect downstream of AT(1) receptors. Paradoxically, AT(1) receptor density and G protein alpha subunits alphaq and alphai1/2 increased. Inotropic responsiveness to the alpha-receptor agonist phenylephrine was normal. Ramipril preserved cardiac contractility, but this effect was attenuated by simultaneous use of kinin receptor blockers. Ramipril also maintained responsiveness to Ang II and prevented AT(1) receptor and G protein upregulation. The simultaneous use of a kinin receptor blocker attenuated but did not prevent upregulation in the AT(1) receptor and G protein. Losartan had no effect on baseline contractility, but it maintained cardiac inotropic responsiveness to Ang II, prevented upregulation of AT(1) receptors, but did not modify G protein upregulation. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure overload of the right ventricle decreases contractility, uncouples AT(1) receptors to downstream signaling pathways, and changes the expression of components of the AT(1) receptor signaling pathway. Ramipril attenuates these effects via kinins. Interventions that prevent local increases in Ang II or block AT(1) receptors also prevent decreased responsiveness of the AT(1) receptor in this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".