MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design of Integrated Operation Process of Supply Chain Response to Market DESIGN DU PROCESSUS D'OPERATION INTEGRAL DE LA CHAINE D'OFFRE REPONSE AU MARCHE

2010· article· fr· W2120788370 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guo Li-fu, Gang Chen, Feng Junxia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainSupply and demandHumanitiesIndustrial organizationEconomicsBusinessMicroeconomicsMarketingArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a supply chain in which a manufacturer is the core enterprise, the manufacturer must take much attention to the speed of its response to a dynamic market, because product life-cycle is shortening and competition is fiercer. For the manufacturer, it is a powerful method to increase its supply chain’s competence that constructing a supply chain which can respond to new market demand quickly and actively. This paper considers a whole process of supply chain response to new market demand would be from a new product R&D to delivering the final products to consumers. The process can be divided into three stages: product R&D, supply chain building, and supply chain operating. So, to increase the efficiency of response to new market demand, the manufacturer would consider how to integrate the three stages smoothly. Key words: supply chain, response time, market demand, R&D Resume: Dans une chaine d’offre dans laquelle un fabricant constitue l’entreprise clef, le fabricant doit preter assez d’attention a la vitesse de sa reponse a un marche dynamique, parce que le cycle de vie du produit raccourcit alors que la competition est de plus en plus feroce. Pour le fabricant, c’est une methode puissante d’ameliorer la competence de sa chaine d’offre de sorte a construire une chaine d’offre qui est capable de repondre rapidement et activement a la demande du marche. L’article present pense que le processus intregral de la chaine d’offre repondant a la nouvelle demande du marche devrait aller de R&D du produit a la delivrance du produit aux consommateurs. Ce processus peut etre divise en trois etapes : R&D du produit, etablissement de la chaine d’offre, operation de la chaine d’offre. Ainsi, pour d’elever l’efficacite de la reponse a la nouvelle demande du marche, le fabricant pourrait considerer comment bien integrer ces trois etapes. Mots-Cles: chaine d’offre, temps de reponse, demande du marche, R&D

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207