Long-term darifenacin treatment for overactive bladder in patients aged 65 years and older: analysis of results from a 2-year, open-label extension study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This analysis evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist, in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients > or = 65 years of age. METHODS: Patients who completed one of two 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, feeder studies received once-daily (o.d.) treatment with darifenacin 7.5 mg for the first 2 weeks of the 2-year, open-label extension study. The dose could be subsequently adjusted (7.5 or 15 mg o.d.) according to need. Safety and tolerability were assessed, and efficacy variables/endpoints were evaluated from patient diary data. RESULTS: 214 patients (65-89 years) entered and 137 (64.0%) completed the 2-year extension study, amounting to 308 patient-years' drug exposure. Darifenacin was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. The most common adverse events (AEs) were dry mouth and constipation, which infrequently resulted in discontinuation (2.3% and 4.2%, respectively). Darifenacin produced significant improvements in OAB symptoms that were maintained over the 2-year period (median reduction from feeder-study baseline to 2 years: -11.0 [-83.7%] for incontinence episodes/week and -1.2 [-12.4%] for micturitions/day, both p < 0.05), with 44.4% patients achieving > or = 90% reduction in incontinence episodes at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Darifenacin demonstrated good tolerability and safety in older patients with OAB. The improvement in OAB symptoms was sustained throughout the 2-year extension, resulting in high treatment persistence rates. Results were comparable with those in the overall OAB population from this study, indicating that darifenacin treatment is effective and well tolerated irrespective of age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".