MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120965315 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts483

Non-Gaussianity and Minkowski functionals: forecasts for Planck

2012· article· en· W2120965315 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ducout, F. R. Bouchet, S. Colombi, D. Pogosyan, S. Prunet

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPlanckNon-GaussianityCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsGalaxyCosmic background radiationNoise (video)COSMIC cancer databaseStatistical physicsSkyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study Minkowski functionals as probes of primordial non-Gaussianity in the cosmic microwave background, specifically for the estimate of the primordial ‘local’ bi-spectrum parameter |$f_{_{\rm NL}}$|⁠, with instrumental parameters which should be appropriate for the Planck experiment. We use a maximum likelihood approach, which we couple with various filtering methods and test thoroughly for convergence. We included the effect of inhomogeneous noise as well as astrophysical biases induced by point sources and by the contamination from the Galaxy. We find that when Wiener filtered maps are used (rather than simply smoothed with Gaussian), the expected error on the measurement of |$f_{_{\rm NL}}$| should be as small as |$\Delta f_{_{\rm NL}} \simeq 10$| when combining the three channels at 100, 143 and 217 GHz in the Planck extended mission setup. This result is fairly insensitive to the non-homogeneous nature of the noise, at least for realistic hitmaps expected from Planck. We then estimate the bias induced on the measurement of |$f_{_{\rm NL}}$| by point sources in those three channels. With the appropriate masking of the bright sources, this bias can be reduced to a negligible level in the 100 and 143 GHz channels. It remains significant in the 217 GHz channel, but can be corrected for. The Galactic foreground biases are quite important and present a complex dependence on sky coverage: making them negligible will depend strongly on the quality of the component separation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207