MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120983087 · doi:10.5430/ijdi.v1n2p18

Transthoracic contrast echocardiography for detection of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: How can the process be improved for patient safety?

2014· article· en· W2120983087 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangning Fan, Jonathan Choy, Miriam Shanks, Dilini Vethanayagam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Diagnostic Imaging · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Anomalies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTelangiectasiaRadiologyPneumothoraxTransthoracic echocardiogramPulmonary embolismRight-to-left shuntParadoxical embolismPopulationShunt (medical)CardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryPatent foramen ovale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) are at risk for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). Extracardiac right-to-left shunts due to PAVMs can lead to systemic emboli; clinical sequelae including strokes and brain abscesses. Regular screening is required, with appropriate medical/interventional management to alleviate morbidity and mortality from PAVMs. International HHT guidelines recommend standardized transthoracic contrast echocardiogram (TTCE) with agitated saline (in an HHT Foundation-accredited laboratory) as the initial screening test, and, when needed, non-contrast computerized tomography of the chest (CT Chest) to follow up on a positive TTCE. Case presentation: A 40-year-old woman was seen for evaluation of HHT and referred for TTCE as part of her PAVM screen. Following administration of agitated saline, she developed a headache, visual changes in her right eye, and right arm weakness, followed by posturing and stiffness in her right arm. Her symptoms resolved after five minutes, consistent with a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Clinical impact: Protocols at our institution were amended following this index case and echocardiography laboratory protocols were adjusted to use a maximum of 0.1 cc air to 9.9 cc saline for TTCE studies in the HHT population. Only the attending echocardiologist who is familiar with possible systemic air embolism during bubble contrast echocardiography in patients with HHT should perform agitation and infusion of contrast and should directly review the images for appropriate visualization during the exam for this test to be appropriately interpreted. Paradoxical emboli due to right-to-left shunt are important to recognize. Best practice for PAVM screening in HHT patients includes use of standardized protocols for the performance and reporting of TTCE in the evaluation of pulmonary shunts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Diagnostic ImagingSame topicVascular Anomalies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207