MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121036626 · doi:10.1080/000155500750042808

Hypothesis: The epidermal permeability barrier is a porous medium

2000· review· en· W2121036626 on OpenAlexaff
Neil Kitson, Jenifer Thewalt

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Dermato Venereologica · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratum corneumPermeability (electromagnetism)CorneocytePermeationMembraneBiophysicsPorous mediumChemistryPorosityIntracellularMaterials scienceChemical engineeringBiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stratum corneum is a complex biological material characterized by very low permeability to water and most other molecules. This material may be thought of as a 'porous medium' composed of impermeable and permeable regions. Intercellular lipid membranes in the stratum corneum are postulated to exist in a mixture of two phases: solid (i.e. impermeable) and liquid crystalline (permeable). The corneocyte envelope is classified as impermeable. Diffusion mechanisms of solutes within, across and between the intercellular lamellae are discussed. This model represents a refinement of previous theories about the physical structures responsible for the low observed permeability of the stratum corneum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Dermato VenereologicaSame topicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207