MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121096254 · doi:10.4141/p02-136

Management of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer in no-till flax

2003· article· en· W2121096254 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
G. P. Lafond, Cynthia A. Grant, Adrian Johnston, Darryl J. McAndrew, William E. May

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsPotashCorp (Canada)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsFertilizerUreaAgronomyCropNitrogenAmmoniumComposition (language)PhosphorusChemistryAmmonium nitratePhosphateYield (engineering)BiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major flax-growing areas of Canada coincide with areas where large shifts towards conservation tillage have occurred. These shifts have also brought about major changes in the way fertilizer is applied. The objective of this study was to determine the combination of nitrogen fertilizer form and N and P fertilizer placement methods that can increase N and P uptake, seed yield and seed oil concentration and composition in flax. The study was conducted at four locations covering the flax-growing areas over a 3-yr period. Three fertilizer forms, ammonium nitrate (AN), ammonium sulphate (AS) and urea were compared using different placement methods, pre-plant band (Pp) or side-band (Sb) in combination with monoammonium phosphate in either a Pp, Sb or seed-placed (Sp) position. Plant uptake of N and P was measured at 7, 14, 21 and 28 d after crop emergence and at the start of flowering. Other variables collected included crop establishment, crop yield and seed oil concentration and composition. AS resulted in the highest N uptake followed by AN then urea. As well, AS in the Sb showed higher N uptake than when applied Pp. The largest uptake of P was observed on days 7, 14 and 21 when AS and P were placed together in an Sb position. Crop establishment was adversely affected by urea and least by AN and AS, indicating that adequate seed-fertilizer separation between urea and flax seed is critical to minimizing reductions in plant stands. N form and placement, and P placement had no effect on seed oil concentration and composition in this study. Seed yield was improved marginally, overall, with the addition of P, while changes in N and P placement had no overall yield benefits. Treatments that resulted in improved N and P uptake in the first 21 d after crop emergence did not result in improved seed yields. When site × year interactions were investigated, 2 of 12 site years showed better yields when N and P were placed together in the Sb position. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that flax growers have many agronomically acceptable N and P management options available. Key words: Linum usitatissimum L., fertilizer placement, fertilizer form, nutrient uptake, seed yield, seed quality, oil quantity, urease inhibitor, Agrotain™

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207