MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121096298 · doi:10.1017/s0263034610000017

Studies of the interaction of an intense laser beam normally incident on an overdense plasma

2010· article· en· W2121096298 on OpenAlex
M. Shoucri, Bedros Afeyan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser and Particle Beams · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryNational Nuclear Security Administration
KeywordsPlasmaPhysicsLinear polarizationAtomic physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)ElectronPonderomotive forceLaserWavelengthIonOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present two contrasting cases of the interaction of a high intensity laser beam with overdense plasma, namely the case of a circular polarization, and the case of a linear polarization of the laser beam. An Eulerian-Vlasov code is used for the numerical solution of the one-dimensional relativistic Vlasov-Maxwell set of equations, for both electrons and ions. The laser beam is incident normally on the plasma surface. We consider the case when the laser wave free space wavelength λ 0 is greater than the scale length of the jump in the plasma density at the plasma edge L edge (λ 0 ≫ L edge ) and the ratio of the plasma density to the critical density is such that n / n cr ≫ 1. The incident high intensity laser radiation is pushing the electrons at the plasma surface through the ponderomotive pressure, producing a sharp density gradient at the plasma surface. There is a build-up of the electron density at this sharp edge that creates a space-charge, giving rise to a longitudinal electric field. The results obtained differ substantially in several aspects when circular or linear polarization for the incident laser wave is considered. In the case of a circular polarization, the radiation pressure is pushing the sharp edge in the forward direction, and the ions are accelerated and reach a free streaming expansion phase where they are neutralized by the electrons. For the case of a linear polarization, there is a standing structure with a sharp edge that forms at the wave front, and in this case, the electrons at the plasma edge oscillate nonlinearly in the field of the wave, which periodically goes to zero. This results in an important distorsion in the reflected electromagnetic wave that includes the generation of harmonics. We present two simulations to illustrate the differences between these two cases. The generation and propagation of collisionless shock waves in these systems are investigated. The results underline the importance of including the ion dynamics in the interaction of high intensity laser waves with overdense plasmas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it