MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2121101274 · doi:10.1139/g06-029

Deletions encompassing the manganese superoxide dismutase gene in the<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>genome

2006· article· en· W2121101274 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amy Belton, Anirban Paul, Atanu Duttaroy

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiologySOD2ComplementationGeneticsGeneSuperoxide dismutaseDrosophila melanogasterMutantMolecular biologyOxidative stressGenomeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two deletions, Df(2R)Sod2-11 and Df(2R)Sod2-332, are recovered that encompass the manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) gene or a null mutant referred to as SOD2n283 in Drosophila. Molecular analysis has revealed that the Df(2R)Sod2-332 deletion completely uncovered both MnSOD and its adjacent gene, Arp53D, whereas Df(2R)Sod2-11 was missing the promoter region of MnSOD gene. As a consequence of reduced MnSOD expression, these deletion heterozygotes are now sensitive to oxidative stress. Complementation analysis with some recently recovered deletions in the 53C/D region has established that other essential loci exist in this interval, and second, that Arp53D function is not essential for the survival of the organism. These deletions will be instrumental in the recovery of missense substitutions in the MnSOD peptide and their influence on oxidative stress resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→