HERRAMIENTAS 2.0 AL SERVICIO DEL E-LEARNING COLABORATIVO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experience arises from courses on e-learning implementation aimed at members of corporations and Universities in Latin America and the Caribbean. The interest in these courses confirms the existence of a variety of virtual education programs in the region and, consequently, the growing acceptance of e-learning. Universities have been developing new experiences and research projects that meet the population’s new educational needs, and working on new teaching and learning programs, that allow their countries to become more competitive. In this context, it was decided to create a virtual community of members belonging to universities that have been implementing or wish to start e-learning projects, with the purpose of constructing knowledge and elaborating a collaborative product. The project was directed by Susana Trabaldo and Nancy Piriz. The general coordination was in charge of Graciela Lorenzatti, and Beatriz Aquino and Edgar Salgado García were active collaborators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it