MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121138505 · doi:10.1039/c5lc00021a

Artery-on-a-chip platform for automated, multimodal assessment of cerebral blood vessel structure and function

2015· article· en· W2121138505 on OpenAlexafffund
Sanjesh Yasotharan, Sascha Pinto, John G. Sled, Steffen‐Sebastian Bolz, Axel Günther

Bibliographic record

VenueLab on a Chip · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke FoundationSt. Michael's HospitalMaRSHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto Public HealthDiscovery CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiomedical engineeringMicrofluidicsBlood vesselStainingIn vivoChemistryAnatomyMaterials sciencePathologyNanotechnologyBiologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a compact microfluidic platform for the automated, multimodal assessment of intact small blood vessels. Mouse olfactory artery segments were reversibly loaded onto a microfluidic device and kept under physiological (i.e., close to in vivo) environmental conditions. For immunohistochemical endpoint protein analysis, automated on chip fixation and staining of the artery eliminated the need for any subsequent tissue sectioning or processing outside the chip. In a first case study, we demonstrate the blood vessel abluminal structure based on the positions of smooth muscle cell nuclei, actin filaments and voltage gated calcium channels. In a second case study we incubated smooth muscle cells (SMCs) with a calcium-sensitive dye to simultaneously assess time-dependent, agonist-induced calcium and diameter changes of pressurized resistance arteries. We expect the presented microfluidic platform to promote routine on-chip staining and quantitative fluorescence imaging of intact blood vessels from different vascular beds, tissue engineered vascular constructs and vascularized microtissues. The at least tenfold reduction in required aliquot volumes for functional assessment and staining was achieved by on-board fluid manipulation of the syringe-pump free platform and may promote its applications for screening of newly synthesized compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLab on a ChipSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207