MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121159767 · doi:10.1017/s0950268805005005

The changing prevalence of drug-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> clonal groups in a community: evidence for community outbreaks of urinary tract infections

2005· article· en· W2121159767 on OpenAlexaff
Amee R. Manges, Pradeep Natarajan, Owen D. Solberg, Peter S. Dietrich, Lee W. Riley

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology and Infection · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEscherichia coliOutbreakMicrobiologyTrimethoprimUrinary systemBiologyAntibioticsUrineDrug resistanceSulfamethoxazoleEpidemiologyMedicineInternal medicineVirologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multidrug-resistant clonal group (CgA) of Escherichia coli was shown to cause half of all trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)-resistant urinary tract infections (UTIs) in a college community between October 1999 and January 2000. This second study was conducted to determine the fate of CgA. Urine E. coli isolates from women with UTI, collected between October 2000 and January 2001, were tested for antibiotic susceptibility, O serogroup, ERIC2 PCR and DNA macrorestriction patterns using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The proportion of UTIs caused by CgA declined by 38% (P<0.001) but the prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMZ did not change. Six additional clonal groups were identified and these were responsible for 32% of TMP-SMZ-resistant UTIs. The temporal decline in the proportion of UTIs caused by CgA provides evidence that CgA caused a community outbreak of UTI. The fluctuation and occurrence of other E. coli clonal groups in this community suggest that a proportion of community-acquired UTIs may be caused by E. coli disseminated from one or more point sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiology and InfectionSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207