Mass Transfer and Bioremediation of Naphthalene and Methyl Naphthalenes in Baffled and Bead Mill Bioreactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mass transfer and bioremediation of naphthalene, 2‐methylnaphthalene and 1,5‐dimethylnaphthalene have been studied in a rotating bioreactor modified with the addition of baffles and beads. Mass transfer rates of these low solubility organic particles dissolving in water (based on the working volume of the bioreactor) were highest in the bioreactor that combined beads and baffles, with the overall mass transfer coefficient (KLa) reaching up to 25 h−1. Based on its capacity to hold the largest volume of polluted media, the simple baffled bioreactor was considered to be the optimum roller bioreactor design. Using Pseudomonas putida, the bioremediation rate of naphthalene reached 61 mg/l‐h in this vessel and using mixed substrates, the bioremediation rate of 2‐methylnaphthalene reached 30 mg/l‐h. The dissolution rates for hydrophobic particles into the culture media during the bioremediation process were up to four times higher compared to mass transfer rates into abiotic controls, which was likely due to the production of biosurfactants by P. putida.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".