MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

ALS-Plus Syndrome: Non-motor Features in a Large ALS Cohort (S36.001)

2014· article· nl· W2121307004 on OpenAlexaff
Shannon M. Vandriel, Leo McCluskey, Lauren Elman, Ashley Boller, Murray Grossman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortMedicineInternal medicineNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: ALS-Plus is a set of non-motor clinical features found in ALS. Here we describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of ALS patients with ALS-Plus syndrome. Methods: In a large cohort of 550 patients with ALS, 75 (13.5%) patients were identified with ALS-plus syndrome and compared to 475 patients without ALS-plus features. Atypical clinical manifestations were categorized into one of five groups, including: extrapyramidal features (resting Tremor, masked face, startled appearance, bradykinesia, rigidity, dystonia, and/or retropulsion), ocular motility abnormalities (gaze abnormalities, horizontal, up gaze, down gaze, impersistence and/or head movements), apraxia (apraxia, apraxia eye closure and/or apraxia other), cerebellar features (ataxia and/or dysmetria) and autonomic dysfunction (excessive sweating, special sensory and/or loss of taste and smell). Genetic screening for SOD1, C9orf72, TARDP, VCP, and ATXN 2 was carried out in 363 of these patients. Results: Ocular motility abnormalities were the most common symptom (84%) and cerebellar dysfunction (1.3%) were the least common. Median number of atypical manifestations per ALS-plus patient was 4. Patients within the ALS-plus phenotype were associated with increased frequency of bulbar (ALS-plus: 49% vs non-ALS-plus: 22%) and cognitive disease (2.6% vs 0.06) at onset; higher incidence of cognitive impairment (8% vs 2.5%), worse survival (29.66 months vs 42.5 months), and increased prevalence of pseudobulbar affect (49.3% vs 25.1%) (all comparisons p>0.001). Familial ALS also was more common in the ALS-Plus phenotype (23.2% vs 4.6%) (χ2 > 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with ALS-Plus represents a unique phenotype in ALS. This clinical presentation suggests that ALS is a multisystem disorder, and the clinical and pathological boundaries of ALS extend outside of the motor system into other brain areas. Study Supported by: AG32953, AG17586, AG38490, NS44266 and the Wyncote Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→