De‐escalation of therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: Trade‐offs between quality of life and survival
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment intensity for pediatric medulloblastoma may vary depending on the type of medulloblastoma. In some cases, the dose of radiation may be reduced or eliminated. Correspondingly, there may be trade-offs between quality of life and survival. In this study, focus groups were conducted with parents and clinicians to explore their opinions about these trade-offs as well as the alignment/misalignment between parents and clinicians regarding the trade-offs. METHODS: One hour semi-structured focus groups were conducted with parents of children with medulloblastoma and health care providers who were involved in the care of these children. RESULTS: Parents and providers showed differences in which factors they believe have the greatest impact on quality of life for children with medulloblastoma and their families. For parents, the most important factor is social functioning and their child's ability to make friends and have a social life. In contrast, providers thought that parents cared most about their child's cognitive functioning and ability to attend and perform in school. CONCLUSION: Understanding parents' perspectives on quality of life is important in terms of providing support services that target the areas that the parents prioritize. The types of functioning that are most strongly correlated with quality of life from the parents' perspective may be the ones that should be targeted to protect during treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1300-1304. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".