MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121378603 · doi:10.1002/fam.889

Combustibility of cyanate ester resins

2005· article· en· W2121378603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFire and Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustibilityCombustionCalorimetryCharSmokeHeat of combustionPyrolysisMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryWaste managementOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flaming and non-flaming combustion studies were conducted on a series of polycyanurates to examine the effect of chemical composition and physical properties on the fire behavior of these crosslinked, char forming, thermoset polymers. Heats of complete combustion of the polymer and fuel gases were determined by oxygen bomb calorimetry and pyrolysis-combustion flow calorimetry, respectively. Fire calorimetry experiments were conducted to measure the total heat released, the rate of heat release and the smoke generation in flaming combustion. Fire response parameters derived from the data include the thermal inertia, heat of gasification, effective heat of combustion and combustion efficiency. Halogen-containing polycyanurates exhibited extremely low heat release rate in flaming combustion compared with the hydrocarbon resins yet produced significantly less smoke and comparable levels of carbon monoxide and soot. Published in 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it