Production de composés indoliques rhizogènes par le ver de terre <i>Lumbricus terrestris</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro application of total gross extract of earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) in diverse dilutions stimulates rhizogenesis in young bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris). The observed effect is similar to that of indol acetic acid, a well-known growth enhancer in plants, used here as a control in various concentrations. Fragmentation of worm extract by column chromatography results in three groups of fractions. Only the polar group of fractions has a significant rhizogenous effect, which is, however, inferior to that observed in the presence of total gross extract of worms or of indol acetic acid. Gross extract analyses using thin layer chromatography, with appropriate chromatography systems and reagents, revealed that indol acetic acid is not present, but is probably replaced by other indol-derived substances that have a neutral to basic chromatographic behaviour. These presumed indol-derived substances are identified as methyl-tryptophane, serotonin, and hydroxy-indol acetic acid. Analyses using mass spectrometry combined with gas chromatography, following fragmentation and purification of the group of rhyzogenous fractions, have revealed the presence of hydroxy-indol carboxylic acid, which seems to take the form of several isomeres.[Journal translation]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".