<scp>E</scp>uropean national poetry,<scp>I</scp>slam and the defeat of the medieval<scp>C</scp>hurch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The M uslim conquest of the H oly L and from C hristendom, the invasion of southwestern E urope in the eighth century, and the C hristian struggle, ultimately unsuccessful, to regain the H oly L and from I slam in the C rusades dominated E uropean culture, particularly its poetry, for centuries. From the O ld F rench epic, T he S ong of R oland (c. 1100) to the A lbanian epic, T he H ighland L ute (early twentieth century), a vast popular culture grew in E uropean vernacular languages in response to M uslim invasions and conquests. This article attempts to elucidate in panoramic form a neglected area of nationalism. It argues that from the medieval period until the fall of the O ttoman empire, poetry was instrumental in the rise of E uropean national identities, partly in reaction to centuries of ascendancy of Islam, which undermined the authority of the P ope, the universal C hurch, the G ospel and L atin. The defeat of the medieval C hurch opened the way to narrower, more national and cultural concerns, reflected in a cluster of vernacular E uropean poetic traditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".