MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121445624 · doi:10.1093/ndt/17.2.253

High urinary excretion of uric acid combined with high excretion of calcium links kidney stone disease to familial hypertension

2002· article· en· W2121445624 on OpenAlexaff
András Tislér, Andreas Pierratos, John DʼArcy Honey, Shelley B. Bull, László Rosivall, Alexander G. Logan

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperuricosuriaHypercalciuriaMedicineInternal medicineKidney stone diseaseGastroenterologyUric acidKidney diseaseEndocrinologyConcomitantKidney stonesExcretion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Past studies identified an association between kidney stone disease (KSD) and hypertension. We recently reported a high occurrence of hypertension in families of patients with hyperuricosuric KSD. As hypercalciura frequently coexists with hyperuricosuria and high urinary excretion of calcium is found in patients with hypertension, we hypothesized that hyperuricosuria that is accompanied by hypercalciuria better describes the familial association between KSD and hypertension. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-six KSD patients, aged 18-50 years, attending a lithotripsy unit collected a 24-h urine sample for metabolic analysis and provided information on family history of hypertension. The familial occurrence of hypertension was compared among four groups of patients: those who had combined elevation of both urinary calcium and uric acid excretions ("combined" abnormality, n=56), those who had hyperuricosuria without concomitant hypercalciuria ("pure" hyperuricosuria, n=67), those who had hypercalciuria without concomitant hyperuricosuira ("pure" hypercalciuria, n=52), and a control KSD patient group ("other" abnormality, n=311). The prevalence of treated hypertension in patients from the four groups was 16%, 12%, 2%, 10%, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-four per cent of the patients with the "combined" abnormality had a positive family history of hypertension, defined as two or more first-degree relatives with treated hypertension, that was significantly higher than in patients with either "pure" hyperuricosuira (15%, P<0.02), "pure" hypercalciuria (8%, P<0.001), or patients with "other" abnormality (10%, P<0.001). The adjusted OR for positive family history of hypertension in the "combined" abnormality group compared to the control KSD patient group was 5.6 (2.39-13.30). The prevalence of hypertension in siblings of patients with the "combined" abnormality (13%) was significantly higher than in siblings of patients with either "pure" hyperuricosuria (3%, P<0.001), "pure" hypercalciuria (1%, P<0.001), or siblings of control patients with "other" abnormality (4%, P<0.001). The adjusted OR for hypertension in siblings of a patient with "combined" abnormality compared to a control KSD patient was 3.4 (1.97-5.91). Patients in the "combined" abnormality group were also characterized by significantly elevated urinary sodium, phosphorus, citrate and potassium excretions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there is a strong, independent association between familial occurrence of hypertension and the phenotype characterized by combined elevation of both urinary uric acid and calcium excretions. The association is not present in those with "pure" hyperuricosuria or "pure" hypercalciuria. Ascertainment of patients based on this phenotype may identify more homogeneous populations for genetic analysis of hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207