Nanostenciling of Functional Materials by Room Temperature Pulsed Laser Deposition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present how various features drawn in a miniature shadow mask (nanostencil) can be efficiently transferred to a surface in the form of three-dimensional nanostructures of metals (Pt, Cr), semiconductors (Ge), and complex oxides (e.g., BaTiO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sub> ) by room temperature pulsed laser deposition. Selective deposition is obtained by interposing a sieve with apertures down to 100 nm between source and substrate. Nanostenciling allows for the organization of structures in predefined architectures with high accuracy. The patterning process is simple and rapid, since it does not imply additional processing steps. It is also parallel, resistless, and does not interfere with the structures' growth dynamics. The material deposited through the stencil mask conserves the desired functionality even at the level of the individual nanostructures. Nanostenciling can be performed in high or ultrahigh vacuum and is suitable for parallel prototyping of fragile or functionalized surfaces
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it