A new concept of Absoloniella (=Ruffodytes syn. n.) for five blind Mediterranean species (Coleoptera: Brachyceridae: Erirhininae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hundred year-long taxonomic ambiguity surrounding two mysterious species originally described as Caulomorphus reitteri Müller, 1912 and Absoloniella cylindrica Formánek, 1913, both known from single specimens believed to be lost, is resolved. This is achieved by designation of their neotypes based on the same specimen collected together, and considered conspecific, with the holotype of Ruffodytes hellenicus Osella, 1973, the latter the type of the genus Ruffodytes Osella, 1973. This action triggers the following nomenclatorial and taxonomic changes: (1) the generic name Ruffodytes Osella, 1973 syn. n. is a junior subjective synonym of Absoloniella Formánek, 1913; (2) the names cylindrica syn. n. and hellenica syn. n. are junior objective and subjective synonyms, respectively, of the name reitteri for the species Absoloniella reitteri (Müller, 1912); (3) the genus Absoloniella currently comprises five species: A. reitteri (Müller, 1912), A. italica (Osella, 1976) comb. n., A. pacei (Osella, 1976) comb. n., A. servadeii (Osella, 1982) and A. nitidipennis (Osella, 1989) comb. n. Puzzling distribution of blind and wingless Mediterranean Absoloniella is briefly discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".