MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functional Improvement with Low-dose Dopaminergic Grafts in Hemiparkinsonian Rats

2004· article· en· W2121564861 on OpenAlexaff
Lynsey E. Bartlett, Damaso Sadi, Matthew R. Lewington, Ivar Mendez

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyrosine hydroxylaseDopaminergicGlial fibrillary acidic proteinTransplantationMedicineStriatumDopamineInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseLesionEndocrinologyPathologyImmunohistochemistryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The beneficial functional effects of neural transplantation in Parkinson's disease are often directly attributed to the number of surviving dopaminergic cells within a graft. However, recent clinical trials of fetal neural transplantation suggest that a high number of dopaminergic cells may induce serious side effects. In this study, we explored the ability of low-dose dopaminergic grafts to produce functional benefits in the 6-hydroxydopamine rodent model of Parkinson's disease over a long period of observation. METHODS: Twelve rats received either 50,000 or 400,000 fetal ventral mesencephalic cells implanted into the striatum. Rotational behavior was assessed after the lesion and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after transplantation. Twelve weeks after transplantation, animals were perfused, and microtome sections were stained for tyrosine hydroxylase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, heat-shock protein 27, and vimentin. RESULTS: The low-dose group had a three-fold increase in tyrosine hydroxylase-positive cell survival rate compared with the high-dose group rate. The low-dose group also had a mean cell diameter significantly higher than the high-dose group. There was no significant difference between groups in fiber density; however, a higher percentage of longer fibers was encountered in the low-dose group. The low-dose group had a lower degree of trauma in the striatum, as assessed by optical density scores from glial fibrillary acidic protein, heat-shock protein 27, and vimentin staining. There was significant improvement in rotational behavior in the high-dose group at 3 weeks after transplantation, whereas the rotational behavior normalized in the low-dose group at 6 weeks after grafting. There was no significant difference in rotational behavior scores between groups at 6 weeks after grafting. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that over time, a low-dose dopaminergic graft has the capability of eliciting the same functional effect as a high-dose graft. Furthermore, low-dose grafts may increase graft survival, fiber outgrowth, and dopamine production and decrease trauma to the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207