MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121565772 · doi:10.1111/jace.14008

Grain Boundary Space Charge Effect and Proton Dynamics in Chemically Stable Perovskite‐Type Ba <sub>0.5</sub> Sr <sub>0.5</sub> Ce <sub>0.6</sub> Zr <sub>0.2</sub> Gd <sub>0.1</sub> Y <sub>0.1</sub> O <sub>3−δ</sub> ( <scp>BSCZGY</scp> ): A Case Study on Effect of Sintering Temperature

2015· article· en· W2121565772 on OpenAlexafffund
Kalpana Singh, Ashok Kumar Baral, Venkataraman Thangadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsGrain boundaryMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)SinteringConductivityProtonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)DielectricElectrical resistivity and conductivitySpace chargeCeramicMineralogyActivation energyGrain sizeCrystallographyMicrostructureElectronChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study reports the effect of sintering temperature on the proton dynamics of perovskite‐type Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Ce 0.6 Zr 0.2 Gd 0.1 Y 0.1 O 3−δ ( BSCZGY ) by establishing a co‐relation between the grain‐boundary ( GB ) space charge effect, electrical conductivity and dielectric loss of the BSCZGY samples sintered at 1300°C, 1400°C, and 1550°C for 20 h in air. Although, the GB s are the main source of resistance in BaZrO 3 based ceramic proton conductors, we show that the GB impedance disappeared above 450°C and 300°C, respectively, for BSCZGY samples sintered at 1300°C and 1400°C. Interestingly, the BSCZGY sample sintered at 1550°C showed absence of GB contribution to total conductivity even at 200°C. The GB electrostatic potential [ϕ(0)] was found to vary between 0.35–0.38 V and 0.4–0.45 V, respectively, for the samples sintered at 1300°C and 1400°C at 200°C–300°C. The migration energy ( E m ) of the protons was found to be 0.71, 0.65 and 0.58 eV for the sample sintered at 1300°C, 1400°C and 1550°C, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207