Hormonal Regulation of Circulating C-Reactive Protein in Men

The plasma concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP), measured by high-sensitivity methods, is a reliable marker of risk of future coronary heart disease (CHD) in healthy individuals (1)(2) and of CHD death in patients with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (3). The possibility of hormonal regulation of circulating CRP is of great interest because male gender is considered an independent risk factor for CHD and estrogen has many beneficial cardiovascular effects in women (4). Both in vivo and in vitro data support the hypothesis that interleukin-6 (IL-6) is the main inducer of the acute-phase CRP response, but other factors such as IL-1β might potentiate IL-6 stimulation of CRP (5). The factors determining unstimulated CRP expression are less known. Because of the strong association between CRP and CHD and the fact that previous studies have shown that CRP to a large extent is regulated on the transcriptional level (5), it is of great interest to identify factors that regulate CRP production. A study of randomized treatment of prostate cancer by orchidectomy or estrogen allowed us to investigate the hormonal influence on circulating CRP concentrations in middle-aged and elderly men. A total of 100 consecutive patients with prostate cancer suitable for hormonal therapy were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized to either orchidectomy or estrogen treatment. The estrogen regimen was 160 mg of polyestradiol phosphate intramuscularly every month during the first 3 months, then 80 mg monthly, plus 1 mg of ethinylestradiol orally for 2 weeks, followed by 150 μg daily. For different reasons, only 83 patients completed the study (orchidectomy, n = 41; estrogen, n = 42). Blood samples were taken before and 6 months after surgery or start of estrogen treatment. The study group has been described previously (6). All patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study, the protocol of which had been approved by the local ethics committee. The high-sensitivity CRP concentration was measured in serum by a nephelometric method using a particle-enhanced reagent (Dade Behring) on a Behring BN ProSpec analyzer (Dade Behring). Serum concentrations of IL-6 and IL-1β were measured in duplicate by ELISA (R&D Systems). Serum concentrations of IL-6 and IL-1β were below the detection limits in 3 and 40 patients, respectively, on either the first or second or both occasions of blood sampling. Values are expressed as the numbers (%), mean (SD), or median (interquartile range). Statistical analysis using analysis of covariance was performed on logarithmically transformed values with the SAS 8.2 program. Multivariate analysis was performed taking into account CRP concentrations before treatment, smoking status, and IL-6 concentrations after treatment. P values were corrected for multiple testing. The basic characteristics of the study groups are presented in Table 11 of the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol51/issue5/. Univariate analysis showed that orchidectomy tended to decrease circulating CRP concentrations (P = 0.45), whereas estrogen treatment tended to increase CRP (P >0.5). There was no difference in CRP concentrations between the groups before treatment, whereas after treatment, patients treated with estrogen had twofold higher CRP concentrations than patients who underwent orchidectomy (P = 0.0003; Fig. 11 and Table 11 ). Multivariate analysis showed that the difference in CRP concentrations after treatment was highly significant (P = 0.0008; Fig. 11 and Table 11 ). There were no differences between the orchidectomy and estrogen groups regarding serum IL-1β and IL-6 concentrations either before or after treatment (Table 11 ). The major finding that estrogen treatment had a pronounced effect on circulating CRP concentrations in men extends the results of previous studies of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy in women (7). Because treatments varied with respect to conjugates of estrogen, estradiol, and their metabolites, it is difficult to compare results between the different studies. Furthermore, the route of administration is of great importance because oral administration leads to increased circulating CRP concentrations whereas transdermal administration does not appear to have any effect on circulating CRP. The authors of one recent study using increasing doses of oral estrogen came to the conclusion that the effect of estrogen was dose-dependent (8). The oral dose used in the present study was higher than the highest dose given in the study by Prestwood et al. (8). The results of our study therefore support the conclusion that high doses of estrogen are associated with increased circulating CRP concentrations. The mechanism behind the pronounced effect of estrogen on CRP is most likely an effect on gene expression in the liver. Strong support for this assumption that this effect is mediated by estrogen itself and not by a factor stimulated by estrogen comes from the observations that the effect is dose-dependent, is seen in both women and men, and occurs only after oral treatment. It is not clear whether the effect of estrogen on gene expression is mediated by transcriptional activation or RNA stabilization. No hormone response elements have been discovered in the promoter of the CRP gene, but one study has shown that estrogen can stimulate the transcription factor C/EBP-β, which is involved in CRP transcription (9). Our data contradict findings in mice transgenic for human CRP, in which testosterone but not estrogen was essential for expression of both unstimulated and acute-phase CRP (10). This discrepancy could be explained by the fact that the transgenic mice had the human CRP gene integrated into another chromosomal context. Because of study design, we cannot exclude that testosterone has an effect on expression of the CRP gene. The findings of the present study might be of major relevance because CRP is associated with an increased risk of CHD, and hormone replacement therapy has been shown to increase the risk of CHD (11). In addition, in the present study, patients who underwent estrogen therapy had more cardiovascular events (6). One limitation of the present study is that participants suffered from prostate cancer, which could possibly, through some unknown mechanism, trigger CRP expression independently of IL-6. However, the randomized design of the study, which produced treatment groups that were balanced regarding severity of disease, should minimize this risk. In this context, it cannot be excluded that estrogen might have pro-inflammatory effects on the prostate itself. However, the correction for IL-6 stimulation of CRP is likely to exclude this reason for the difference in circulating CRP concentrations between the two groups. Another limitation is that the analyses were performed on blood samples that had been frozen for more than 20 years. Such long-term storage might lead to concentration of samples as a result of freeze drying. Speaking against such an effect is the fact that serum CRP concentrations were within the reference interval. Furthermore, freeze-drying effects would most likely affect both treatment groups similarly. In conclusion, we have shown that estrogen treatment in middle-aged and elderly men is associated with increased circulating CRP concentrations, indicating a role for estrogen in the regulation of unstimulated CRP. The results clearly emphasize the need for further molecular studies of hormonal effects on the regulation of CRP expression. IL-1β, IL-6, and CRP concentrations. IL-1β, IL-6, and CRP concentrations. Box-plots of CRP concentrations grouped by treatment and time. The error bars encompass 95% of the values, and the boxes encompass 50%. O, orchidectomy; E, estrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.