MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121584368 · doi:10.1002/cne.10246

Central administration of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) causes increased neuronal activation and up‐regulation of NPFF gene expression in the rat brainstem

2002· article· en· W2121584368 on OpenAlexaff
Jack H. Jhamandas, David MacTavish

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitary tractBrainstemInternal medicineEndocrinologyNociceptionc-FosNeuropeptideIn situ hybridizationArea postremaChemistryGene expressionBiologyCentral nervous systemMedicineReceptorGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is a morphine modulatory peptide that plays an important role in a wide variety of physiological functions, including those related to nociception and central autonomic regulation. NPFF fibers and cells have been shown to be discretely localized in key autonomic centers within the brain, including the brainstem nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). Central applications of NPFF evoke a number of important biological effects through activation of central neuronal circuits whose identities remain unknown at present. NPFF administered in this manner may also be capable of up- or down-regulating its own gene expression. In this study, we investigated the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NPFF on the activation and the gene expression of NPFF in NTS neurons. Conscious rats received saline or NPFF (8 or 10 microg i.c.v.), with concomitant monitoring of arterial blood pressure. Brains were prepared for Fos immunohistochemistry to identify neuronal activation and NPFF in situ hybridization to determine cells expressing NPFF mRNA in the NTS. At a dose of 8 microg, i.c.v., NPFF did not evoke alterations in blood pressure, but, at 10 microg, there was an increase in arterial blood pressure of 30-40 mmHg. Image analysis showed a dose-dependent increase in number of NPFF neurons that were activated in rats receiving i.c.v. NPFF compared with saline controls. NPFF gene expression in the NTS showed a similar dose-dependent increase following i.c.v. administration of either 8 or 10 microg of NPFF. Significantly greater numbers of activated neurons expressing the NPFF gene (double labeled) were observed in the NTS at the level of the area postrema in animals receiving i.c.v. NPFF compared with saline controls. These data indicate that centrally administered NPFF is capable of up-regulating its own gene expression in the NTS and that this effect appears in part to be independent of elevations in arterial blood pressure that this peptide can evoke when administered i.c.v. at the higher dose. The up-regulation of NPFF may play a homeostatic role in response to specific cardiovascular challenges, such as hypotension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207