MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121592411 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0801773

Steel Factor Enhances Supraoptimal Antigen-Induced IL-6 Production from Mast Cells via Activation of Protein Kinase C-β

2009· article· en· W2121592411 on OpenAlexaff
Kerstin Fehrenbach, Eva Lessmann, Carolin N. Zorn, Marcel Kuhny, Gordon Grochowy, Gerald Krystal, Michael Leitges, Michael Huber

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research InstituteBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegranulationProtein kinase CChemistryLYNCell biologyMAPK/ERK pathwaySecretionp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasesMolecular biologyPhosphorylationBiologyBiochemistryReceptorProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ag-triggered mast cell (MC) activation follows a bell-shaped dose-response curve. Reduced activation in response to supraoptimal Ag concentrations is thought to be due to preferential engagement of inhibitory-acting proteins like SHIP1, Lyn, and protein kinase C (PKC)-delta. We show in this study that short-term prestimulation with Steel factor (SF) prevents supraoptimal Ag inhibition, resulting in synergistic MC degranulation and IL-6 secretion. These events are preceded by synergistic phosphorylation/activation of numerous signaling proteins, e.g., Erk, p38, and LAT. However, these effects of prestimulation with SF appear not to be due to reduced engagement of the attenuator SHIP1. Pharmacological analyses suggest that the activation of conventional PKCs is important for this synergy. Specifically, although we found that the conventional PKC inhibitor, Gö6976, likely has some PKC-independent targets in MCs, it led us to further studies that established SF plus Ag-induced IL-6 secretion was severely impaired in PKC-beta(-/-) MCs, but not PKC-alpha(-/-) MCs. Thus, PKC-beta joins PI3K and Btk as important players in this synergistic MC activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207