Critical Evaluation and Thermodynamic Modeling of the MgO–MnO–Mn <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> –SiO <sub>2</sub> System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A complete literature review, critical evaluation, and thermodynamic optimization of phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties of the MgO–MnO–Mn 2 O 3 –SiO 2 system at 1 atm pressure are presented. The molten oxide phase was described by the Modified Quasichemical Model considering the short‐range ordering in molten oxide, and the Gibbs energies of solid solutions were described using the Compound Energy Formalism considering the crystal structure of each solid solution. A set of optimized model parameters of all phases was obtained which reproduces all available and reliable thermodynamic data and phase diagrams within experimental error limits from 25°C to above the liquidus temperatures over the entire range of composition under the oxygen partial pressures from metallic saturation to 1 atm. The database of the model parameters can be used along with software for the Gibbs energy minimization to calculate any phase diagram section and thermodynamic property within the present system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".