MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121748026 · doi:10.3233/jad-2002-4207

Controversies over p25 in Alzheimer's disease

2002· article· en· W2121748026 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathy C. Nguyen, Jesusa L. Rosales, Milan Barboza, Ki‐Young Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alzheimer s Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsCyclin-dependent kinase 5NeurodegenerationHyperphosphorylationCalpainCell biologyPhosphorylationChemistryKinaseActivator (genetics)Tau proteinNeuroscienceAlzheimer's diseaseBiologyProtein kinase ABiochemistryCyclin-dependent kinase 2Internal medicineMedicineEnzymeReceptorDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activity of the neuronal Cdc2-like kinase composed of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) and its activator, p35, is critical for the normal development of the central nervous system, including cortical lamination and axonal patterning events. Conversely, altered Cdk5 activity has been associated with several neuronal defects including neurodegeneration. Indeed, an increasing line of evidence suggests that Cdk5 contributes to neurodegeneration in AD. For example, Cdk5 immunoreactivity is consistently detected in neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [15]; Cdk5 phosphorylates tau and promotes dimerization of tau to an AD-like state [2, 13]; sulfated glycosaminoglycans co-exist with tau and Cdk5 in NFTs and remarkably enhance tau phosphorylation by Cdk5 [5]; protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which shows decreased activity in AD brains [4], is inhibited by Cdk5 through phosphorylation of the PP1 inhibitor protein (I-1) [6]; in primary neuronal cultures, Aβ induces activation of Cdk5 that results in tau hyperphosphorylation, cytoskeletal collapse, and cell death [1, 9]. In addition, we and others have shown elevated Cdk5 activity in mice exhibiting tau hyperphosphorylation [10], and in AD brains [7,11]. However, the molecular mechanisms whereby Cdk5 activity is upregulated in AD brain remain to be investigated. Recently, it was suggested that Cdk5 activity is enhanced by calcium through induction of p35 cleavage to p25 via calpain activation [9]. The active truncated form of p35, p25, was then shown to accumulate in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alzheimer s DiseaseSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207