Bibliographic record
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) wave speed (LVWS) was studied experimentally and confirmed in theory. Combining the definition of elastance (E) with the equations for the conservation of mass and momentum shows that LVWS is proportional to the square root of ELA, where L is long-axis length and A is the cross-sectional area, and the density of the blood. (We defined ELA = gamma, where gamma is compressibility.) We studied nine open chest, anesthetized dogs, three of which were studied during caval constriction when LV end-diastolic pressure was < or =0 mmHg. The hearts were paced at approximately 90 beats/min, and LV cross-sectional area was measured by using two pairs of ultrasonic crystals; E was calculated from the LV pressure-area loop. A pulse generator was connected to the LV apex, and LVWS was measured by using two pressure transducers: one near the apex and the other near the base. Their distance was measured roentgenographically and compared with the diameter of a reference ball. LVWS ranged from approximately 1 m/s during diastole to approximately 10 m/s during systole. The slope of the log c (where c is wave speed) vs. log gamma was 0.546, which is in agreement with theory (0.5). When gamma < or = 0, LVWS was approximately 1.5 m/s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".