Conformational Maturation and Post-ER Multisubunit Assembly of Gap Junction Proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For all previously well-characterized oligomeric integral membrane proteins, folding, multisubunit assembly, and recognition of conformationally immature molecules for degradation occurs at their organelle of synthesis. This cannot, however, be the case for the gap junction-forming protein connexin43 (Cx43), which when endogenously expressed undergoes multisubunit assembly into connexons only after its transport to the trans-Golgi network. We have developed two novel assays to assess Cx43 folding and assembly: acquisition of resistance of disulfide bonds to reduction by extracellularly added DTT and Triton X-114 detergent phase partitioning. We show that Cx43 synthesized at physiologically relevant levels undergoes a multistep conformational maturation process in which folding of connexin monomers within the ER is a prerequisite for multisubunit assembly in the TGN. Similar results were obtained with Cx32, disproving the widely reported contention that the site of endogenous beta connexin assembly is the ER. Exogenous overexpression of Cx43, Cx32, or Cx26 allows these events to take place within the ER, the first example of the TGN and ER as alternative sites for oligomeric assembly. Our findings also constitute the first biochemical evidence that defective connexin folding is a cause of the human disorder X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".