Early versus later onset childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical features, treatment and outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare clinical features, treatment and disease outcome in patients with early versus later onset of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). A retrospective matched cohort study of cSLE patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2008 and followed for a minimum of one year was conducted. Thirty-four pre-pubertal cSLE patients with disease onset prior to their 12th birthday were matched by ethnicity and year of diagnosis to 34 pubertal cSLE patients. The most common criteria at diagnosis in both groups were malar rash, arthritis, hematologic manifestations, and renal disease. After a mean follow-up of more than six years, a similar proportion of patients in the two groups were still prescribed corticosteroids (47% and 41%); patients in the early onset group required a significantly higher daily dose (0.6 mg/kg prednisone-equivalent versus 0.2 mg/kg, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in organ involvement, disease activity and disease damage between the two groups, and severe complications occurred at similar rates. There were a greater number of admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the early onset group (18 versus 5, p = 0.01), with time-to-event analysis demonstrating a significantly shorter disease duration from diagnosis to first PICU admission in the early onset group (p < 0.001). While a similar proportion of patients in the early and later onset groups required treatment with cyclophosphamide, patients in the early onset group received treatment earlier in their disease course (mean 13.7 versus 19.9 months, p < 0.001). Early onset cSLE leads to earlier and more frequent PICU admission, earlier use of cyclophosphamide, and higher corticosteroid dose at long-term follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".