During hypoxic exercise some vasoconstriction is needed to match O<sub>2</sub>delivery with O<sub>2</sub>demand at the microcirculatory level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that the increased sympathetic tonus elicited by chronic hypoxia is needed to match O(2) delivery with O(2) demand at the microvascular level eight male subjects were investigated at 4559 m altitude during maximal exercise with and without infusion of ATP (80 mug (kg body mass)(-1) min(-1)) into the right femoral artery. Compared to sea level peak leg vascular conductance was reduced by 39% at altitude. However, the infusion of ATP at altitude did not alter femoral vein blood flow (7.6 +/- 1.0 versus 7.9 +/- 1.0 l min(-1)) and femoral arterial oxygen delivery (1.2 +/- 0.2 versus 1.3 +/- 0.2 l min(-1); control and ATP, respectively). Despite the fact that with ATP mean arterial blood pressure decreased (106.9 +/- 14.2 versus 83.3 +/- 16.0 mmHg, P < 0.05), peak cardiac output remained unchanged. Arterial oxygen extraction fraction was reduced from 85.9 +/- 5.3 to 72.0 +/- 10.2% (P < 0.05), and the corresponding venous O(2) content was increased from 25.5 +/- 10.0 to 46.3 +/- 18.5 ml l(-1) (control and ATP, respectively, P < 0.05). With ATP, leg arterial-venous O(2) difference was decreased (P < 0.05) from 139.3 +/- 9.0 to 116.9 +/- 8.4(-1) and leg .VO(2max) was 20% lower compared to the control trial (1.1 +/- 0.2 versus 0.9 +/- 0.1 l min(-1)) (P = 0.069). In summary, at altitude, some degree of vasoconstriction is needed to match O(2) delivery with O(2) demand. Peak cardiac output at altitude is not limited by excessive mean arterial pressure. Exercising leg .VO(2peak) is not limited by restricted vasodilatation in the altitude-acclimatized human.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".