MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122015054 · doi:10.5194/acpd-4-6667-2004

Vortex-averaged Arctic ozone depletion in the winter 2002/2003

2004· article· en· W2122015054 on OpenAlexaff
T. Christensen, B. M. Knudsen, M. Streibel, S. B. Andersen, A. Benesova, Geir Braathen, H. Claude, J. Davies, H. De Backer, H. Dier, V. Dorokhov, Michael Gerding, M. Gil, B. Henchoz, H. Kelder, Rigel Kivi, E. Kyrö, Z. Lityñska, David Moore, G. Peters, P. Skřivánková, René Stübi, Timo Turunen, G. Vaughan, P. Viatte, Aasmund Fahre Vik, Peter von der Gathen, I. Zaitcev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabaticVortexPolar vortexOzoneDescent (aeronautics)Atmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceOzone depletionTourbillonMeteorologyAir mass (solar energy)ClimatologyPhysicsGeologyBoundary layerMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. A total ozone depletion of 68 Dobson units from 10 December 2002 to 10 March 2003 is derived by the vortex-average method taking into account both diabatic descent of the air masses and transport of air into the vortex. When the vortex is divided into three equal-area regions, the results are 85 DU for the collar region (closest to the edge), 52 DU for the vortex centre and 68 DU for the middle region in between centre and collar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207