MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122020723 · doi:10.1136/jcp.2010.087916

Rounded intraplacental haematomas due to decidual vasculopathy have a distinctive morphology

2011· article· en· W2122020723 on OpenAlexaff
Brendan Fitzgerald, Patrick Shannon, John‏ Kingdom, Sarah Keating

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Pathology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervillous spaceThrombusPlacentaBasal plate (neural tube)MedicinePlacental CirculationAnatomyPathologyPregnancyBiologySurgeryFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the placenta, most centrally placed intervillous thrombi are thought to form at sites of foetomaternal haemorrhage, while parabasally located intervillous thombi have been linked to maternal vascular disease. To determine whether parabasally located haemorrhagic lesions were morphologically heterogeneous, the authors performed a retrospective review of 25 placentas with thrombohaematomas occurring in the vicinity of the basal plate. Using morphological criteria, two lesions were distinguished: (1) the parabasally located intervillous thrombus, which had all the morphological features of more centrally located intervillous thrombi; and (2) the rounded intraplacental haematoma. Rounded intraplacental haematomas form as a result of disruption of vasculopathic decidual arterioles in a setting of maternal vascular underperfusion and are thus aetiologically distinct from classically described intervillous thrombi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical PathologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207