MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122046836 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2015-0081

Floral development of <i>Condylocarpon isthmicum</i> (Apocynaceae)

2015· article· en· W2122046836 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rosemeri Morokawa, Juliana Lischka Sampaio Mayer, André Olmos Simões, Luiza Sumiko Kinoshita

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsBiologyApocynaceaeStamenBotanyAnthesisGynoeciumOvaryInflorescenceNectarBractTrichomePollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apocynaceae is one of the largest families of angiosperms. Its representatives have flowers with relatively simple morphology, ranging from anthers free from the style head to more complex flowers in which the anthers are postgenitally united with the style head, forming a gynostegium, and those with a style head that is vertically differentiated into distinct functional regions. The aim of this study is to understand the morphology and secretory structures of Condylocarpon isthmicum (Vell.) A.DC. at different stages of development. This species, which is in the family Apocynaceae, has morphologically simple flowers. Flowers at four different stages of development were collected and processed for anatomical and histochemical analysis; floral anatomy was examined using light and scanning electron microscopy. The simplicity of the C. isthmicum flower morphology was contrasted with the complexity observed in the secretory structures at different stages of flower development. Four secretory structures were identified in this species: colleters, style head epidermal cells, nectariferous tissue, and an obturator. The colleters were observed in the bracts and bracteoles of the young inflorescences. The style head began the secretory phase in the pre-anthetic stage and remained in this phase until anthesis. The nectariferous tissue was secreted during anthesis, and the obturator was present only in post-anthetic flowers. We identified a nectary in the wall of the ovary, and we verified and described a new structure in the Apocynaceae, the obturator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207